|
Post by x n0ise on Jun 15, 2002 20:47:54 GMT -5
To me,murders are artists
That scares me...a lot.
Don't worry,the devil made them do it. Yeah,they *are* different.
The Devil didn't make them do anything. The Devil tempts them, they just decided to take up on that tempt. And yes, they're different all right. Insanely different.
You obviously didn't get what I meant about the brothers and sisters thing. To me, We're All Brothers And Sisters In GOD'S Eyes.
Yes, we're all brothers and sisters in God's eyes...but that doesn't mean He accepts what we do...?
|
|
|
Post by Ich Liebe Rammstein on Jun 16, 2002 0:38:43 GMT -5
<<<< To me,murders are artists
That scares me...a lot. >>>>
Well,check this,they kill people. That's a masterpeice. It's a frightening fairy tale that can't end. Some people get their body's chopped up in little peices and some get their blood on walls.
I,just as many others,think it's sick and disturbing for someone to kill another being. But if you can't understand,then no one will.
=Please,if anyone has something to say about the above,either PM me or leave it be=
|
|
|
Post by pettyluv on Jun 16, 2002 1:14:08 GMT -5
<<It's a frightening fairy tale that can't end. >>
Except it is not a "fairy tale" it is real life, real people being killed by scumbag murderers. This is reality, not fantasy. When you kill, you take something that can never be given back. And as far as I am concerned, when you kill someone, you sentance yourself to death.
|
|
|
Post by Ich Liebe Rammstein on Jun 16, 2002 1:18:13 GMT -5
^^^^^^ I never said it was a fantasy. But it would sure feel like a dream if someone I knew and possibly loved was murdered. Plus I was saying that in another way,I didn't actually mean that it was a fairy tale
|
|
|
Post by .Hunting:High:and:Low. on Jun 16, 2002 12:21:38 GMT -5
LinkinPark said: <<Well,check this,they kill people. That's a masterpeice. It's a frightening fairy tale that can't end. Some people get their body's chopped up in little peices and some get their blood on walls.
I,just as many others,think it's sick and disturbing for someone to kill another being. But if you can't understand,then no one will.>>
I'm getting sick of this. I don't even think I will respond. Except for this: You want me to understand the killer? BS.
To which pettyluv said: <<Except it is not a "fairy tale" it is real life, real people being killed by scumbag murderers. This is reality, not fantasy. When you kill, you take something that can never be given back. And as far as I am concerned, when you kill someone, you sentance yourself to death.>>
THANK YOU! Someone said something that makes sense!
And LP responded with: <<I never said it was a fantasy. But it would sure feel like a dream if someone I knew and possibly loved was murdered. Plus I was saying that in another way,I didn't actually mean that it was a fairy tale>>
Linken, you need to stop with the analogies if you can't use them properly. You said it was a "frightening fairy tale that can't end" and you are talking about murderers. So pettyluv interpretted it correctly. Yes, it would feel like it was unreal, but in the end, all you have is the reality of the horror someone chose to inflict upon someone and their family. And in the end, all of that is quite real.
|
|
|
Post by Ich Liebe Rammstein on Jun 16, 2002 17:03:05 GMT -5
<<<< I'm getting sick of this. I don't even think I will respond. >>>>
Then why did you?? You must not have saw where I put 'Please,if you have something to say about the above either PM me or leave it be" something like that. If you or anyone else can't handle what i say,it's not my fucking problem.
HaHa. You guys are funny.
My favorite inside source. I kiss your open sores. I appreciate your concern. You'r gonna stink and burn.
|
|
|
Post by .Hunting:High:and:Low. on Jun 16, 2002 17:33:35 GMT -5
Watch the language, Linken. Being a Global Mod doesn't give you the right to throw curse words around left and right...
|
|
|
Post by Ich Liebe Rammstein on Jun 16, 2002 19:38:53 GMT -5
*It's Linkin
And I didn't "throw them left and right" I only used one word.
|
|
|
Post by .Hunting:High:and:Low. on Jun 16, 2002 20:41:03 GMT -5
Sorry, typo... I know, I was just being smart.
|
|
|
Post by Ich Liebe Rammstein on Jun 16, 2002 20:50:25 GMT -5
^^^^^^ lolZ ;D
|
|
|
Post by x n0ise on Jun 16, 2002 22:06:11 GMT -5
Murder is not a masterpiece, it's a crime. A masterpiece is something someone should be proud of. And if someone is proud of killing and taking the life of another human being, I am frightened for this person. It's a sad thought.
|
|
|
Post by sunny.side.up on Jun 17, 2002 8:46:13 GMT -5
I would just like to say... in my opinion, there's nothing wrong with trying to understand why people kill or with feeling sympathy for a murderer, as long as you don't 'sympathize' with the actual murder... Actually the only way to prevent murder or make a good rehab-program is to understand what drives people to murder. Understanding a murderer doesn't mean agreeing with his actions.
~*Esther*~
|
|
|
Post by x n0ise on Jun 17, 2002 22:19:07 GMT -5
^^^I do agree with that, but I do not agree with murder being a masterpiece or with them being 'artists'. That just wouldn't be right.
|
|
|
Post by SunShine on Jun 20, 2002 3:38:52 GMT -5
I'm unsure on this topic. I was against it, but both sides have good points. I think killing someone for killing someone else isn't right, but I know that if any of my friends or family were murdered I would want the murderer to suffer the worst way possible, whether it be life in prison or death.
|
|
|
Post by pettyluv on Jun 24, 2002 11:32:32 GMT -5
Only Juries Can Impose Death Penalty, Supreme Court Rules WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Supreme Court Monday ruled that it is unconstitutional for judges rather than juries to decide whether to impose the death penalty in capital cases. The ruling will require reconsideration of the death penalties of more than 100 death row inmates in five states where a judge makes the final decision. The 7-2 ruling affects the way death sentences are imposed in at least five states. In some states juries determine guilt or innocence, but a judge then bases the sentence on aggravating factors, such as the heinous nature of a murder or whether it was committed for monetary gain. Monday's ruling turned on the Constitution's guarantee of a jury of one's peers and a Supreme Court ruling two years ago that struck down another kind of sentence determined by a judge instead of a jury. In a case from Arizona, the Supreme Court majority declared it is a violation of the right to trial by jury for a judge to impose the sentence, even where a jury has determined guilt. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg delivered the opinion. Only Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Justice Sandra Day O'Connor dissented. The case involved Timothy Ring, who was found guilty by a jury of first-degree murder in the death of the driver of an armored van in 1994 in Maricopa County, Arizona. www.cnn.com/2002/LAW/06/24/scotus.executions/index.html
|
|